Adjusted Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model, According to the Marshall Preferences (Case Study: Iran)

Mohammadzadeh, Azam; shahyaki tash, mohammad nabi; roshan, reza

doi:10.18869/acadpub.jemr.7.25.7

Volume 7, Issue 25 (10-2016) jemr 2016, 7(25): 7-42 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.18869/acadpub.jemr.7.25.7

‎ 20.1001.1.22286454.1395.7.25.5.9

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mohammadzadeh A, shahyaki tash M N, roshan R. Adjusted Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model, According to the Marshall Preferences (Case Study: Iran). jemr 2016; 7 (25) :7-42
URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1242-en.html

Adjusted Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model, According to the Marshall Preferences (Case Study: Iran)

Azam Mohammadzadeh ^*

¹, Mohammad nabi Shahyaki tash²

, Reza Roshan³

1- univercity of sistan & baluchestan , az.mohammadzadeh@gmail.com
2- univercity of sistan & baluchestan
3- university of khalij fars

Abstract: (7122 Views)

One of the capital asset pricing models is CCAPM model that first time were presented by Breeden (1979). In the standard and the basic CCAPM establishes a linear relationship between consumption’s beta and excess return on assets but unfortunately, linear CCAPM made The Equity Premium Puzzle. After presenting puzzles like equity premium puzzle, adjustments were made in the CCAPM. For this purpose in this paper, adjustments have been made in the preferences as explores the implications of a novel class of preferences for the behavior of asset prices. This class of preferences was suggested first time by Marshall (1920), that according to it, people derive utility not only from consumption, but also from the very act of saving.
In this paper, we derive the Euler equations after modeling preferences based on the savings and consumption estimate them with GMM. In order to estimate the models, is examined quarterly data of 1977 to 2010. The models are significant in the other words it can be concluded that consumption and saving are successful in explaining stocks returns. Based on the estimated parameters in the models we can conclude that β is greater than 0.8 and savings is significant in preferences function but don’t have high value. In addition, these results indicate that economic agents are risk averse.

Keywords: Capital Asset Pricing, Preferences, Saving, Saving-Based Asset-Pricing

Full-Text [PDF 3180 kb] (4304 Downloads)

Type of Study: بنیادی | Subject: پولی و مالی
Received: 2015/05/7 | Accepted: 2016/11/16 | Published: 2016/12/19

References

1.  Asprem, M. (1989). Stock prices, asset portfolios and macroeconomic variables in 10 European countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 89- 612. [DOI:10.1016/0378-4266(89)90032-0]

2.  Auer, B.R. (2013). Can habit formation under complete market integration explain the cross-section of international equity risk premia? Review of Financial Economics, 22, 61-67.

3.  Bach, C., & Moller, S. (2011). Habit-based asset pricing with limited participation consumption, Journal of Banking & Finance. 35, 2891–2901

4.  Breeden, D. T. (1979). An inter temporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 265-296. [DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(79)90016-3]

5.  Campbell, J. Y. (1993). Inter temporal asset pricing without consumption data. American Economic Review, 83, 487-512.

6.  Campbell, J. Y. (1996). Consumption and the stock market: Interpreting international experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 3,251-299. [DOI:10.3386/w5610]

7.  Chen, Ming-Hsiang. (2003). Risk and return: CAPM and CCAPM, Journal of Economic and Finance. 4, 369-393.

8.  Cochrane, J.H. (2005). Asset pricing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.

9.  Cumby, R. E. (1990). Consumption risk and international equity returns: Some empirical evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance. 9, 182-192. [DOI:10.1016/0261-5606(90)90029-Y]

10.  Dreyer, J. K. Schneider, J. Smith , W. (2013). Saving-based asset-pricing. Journal of Banking & Finance 37, 3704–3715. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.034]

11.  Epstein, L. G . Zin, S. E. (1991). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 263-286. [DOI:10.1086/261750]

12.  Fung, K. T,& Lau, C.K ,& Chan, K. H. (2014). The conditional equity premium, cross-sectional returns and stochastic volatility. Journal of Economic Modeling, 38, 316- 327. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.009]

13.  Gregoriou, A.& Ioannidis, C. (2006). Generalized method of moments and value tests of the consumption-capital asset pricing model under transactions. Empirical Economics. 32, 19-39. [DOI:10.1007/s00181-006-0070-9]

14.  Hamori, S. (1992). Test of C-CAPM for Japan: 1980–1988. Economics Letters. 38, 67-72. [DOI:10.1016/0165-1765(92)90163-S]

15.  Hansen, L. P.&. Singleton, K. J. (1982) Generalized instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica. 50, 1269-1286. [DOI:10.2307/1911873]

16.  Hansen, L.P. (1982). Large Sample properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators. Econometrica. 50, 1029- 1054 [DOI:10.2307/1912775]

17.  Hansen, L. P.& Jagannathan, R. (1991).Restrictions on Inter temporal Marginal Rates of Substitution Implied by Asset Returns. Journal of Political Economy. 99, 225-262. [DOI:10.1086/261749]

18.  Huang, L. &Wu, J. & Zhang, R. (2014). Exchange risk and asset returns: A theoretical and empirical study of an open economy asset pricing model , Emerging Markets Review. 21, 96–116

19.  Ito, M. & Noda, A. (2011).CCAPM with Time-Varing Parameters: some Evidence from japan. Keio Economics Society Disccussion Paper Series. KESDP 11-4.

20.  Kang, J. & Tong S.K. & Changjun L & Byoung-Kyu M.J.(2011). Macroeconomic risk and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance ,35, 3158–3173. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.04.012]

21.  Karagyozova, T. (2007). Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Agents Incomplete Markets and Trading Constraints. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, working paper 2007-46.

22.  Kim, J. (2012). Evaluating time-series restrictions for cross-sections of expected returns: Multifactor CCAPMs. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 20, 688–706. [DOI:10.1016/j.pacfin.2012.02.001]

23.  Kim, K. H. (2014). Counter-cyclical Risk Aversion. Journal of Empirical Finance. 29(C): 384-401 [DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.09.005]

24.  Kocher lakota, Narayana R. (1996). The equity premium: It's still a puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 42-71.

25.  Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13-37. [DOI:10.2307/1924119]

26.  Lucas, R. (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46, 1429-1445. [DOI:10.2307/1913837]