This study examines the social cost of banking industry in Iran (17 governmental and private banks) in an unbalanced panel data model.
To conduct estimations, two different approaches were taken: 1- Welfare Triangle approach 2- Libenstein’s approach. In the former, welfare triangle is measured assuming banking industry operating in full technical efficiency however, the latter includes both the effect of welfare triangle and the cost of likely technical X-inefficiency. The result of the first method showed that the social cost of banks in Iran is little, amounting to be less than 1 percent of GDP in 2008 while within the same period, the second method resulted in 4 percent of GDP, as the social cost of banks in Iran.
shafiee, A., shafiee, A., & Tashkini, A. (2010). Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency. Economic Modeling Research, 1(1), 107-135.
MLA
shafiee, A., shafiee, A., & Tashkini, A. "Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency", Economic Modeling Research, 1, 1, 2010, 107-135.
HARVARD
shafiee A., shafiee A., Tashkini A. (2010). 'Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency', Economic Modeling Research, 1(1), pp. 107-135.
CHICAGO
A. shafiee, A. shafiee & A. Tashkini, "Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency," Economic Modeling Research, 1 1 (2010): 107-135,
VANCOUVER
shafiee A., shafiee A., Tashkini A. Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency. Economic Modeling Research. 2010;1(1):107-135 (In Persian).